This is a sample report. Hartwell & Birch Family Law is a fictional business and the answers below are generated sample data.
Your report runs against live AI answers and looks exactly like this. Run your free check. It takes about a minute.
When buyers ask AI, Hartwell & Birch Family Law mostly isn't the answer.
AI recommends Vance Legal Group about 4.9x more often than you. Across 8 real search-and-assistant tests, AI names Hartwell & Birch Family Law in just 17% of answers - and in 4 of them you never appear at all. Every one is a high-intent buyer handed to a competitor or a platform. The good news: the gap is fixable, and the plan below shows exactly how.
Each bar is how often AI names that business — an answer can name several or none, so they don't add up to 100%.
All 4 AI assistants
PerplexityOnly 10% of AI's links point home. The rest is still open.
Every time AI answers a buyer, it links somewhere. 83% goes to platforms and directories that put themselves between you and the buyer, and 7% to guides, reviews and rivals - pages you could be cited on, but aren't yet.
Two yardsticks per business: how often AI names them in an answer, and what share of AI's links go to their own site.
Every one of those 83% reaches your buyer before you do. Get named and cited directly, and the customer comes straight to you.
See every fix that wins you customers
These are your top 3 on Gemini alone. The full audit ranks every fix across all four AI assistants, each with copy-paste markup, so more buyers come to Hartwell & Birch Family Law direct instead of through a middleman.
Unlock the full audit — $49One-time. No subscription.
Website Health scorecard
Every signal AI assistants and Google use to decide whether to recommend you — measured live on your site. Worst sections first, so what to fix is up top.
| Status | Check | Result | Target | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structured data (schema) · 0/2 | ||||
| Fail | Business schema no LegalService or LocalBusiness markup, so AI can't read your practice areas or service area | Generic Organization only | — | High |
| Fail | FAQ schema you're invisible to the question-style prompts clients ask AI | No FAQPage markup | — | High |
| Performance · 1/4 | ||||
| Fail | Largest Contentful Paint on mobile, visitors leave before it loads | 4.8s | <2.5s | High |
| Fix | Layout shift (CLS) content jumps as it loads | 0.21 | <0.1 | Med |
| Fix | Page weight (HTML) heavy markup slows first paint | 312 KB | <120 KB | Med |
| Pass | Server response (TTFB) | 1.1s | — | |
| Agent readiness · 2/5 | ||||
| Fail | Labeled form fields agents can't tell what to type where | 1 of 4 | — | Med |
| Fix | WebMCP manifest agents have to reverse-engineer your booking flow | Not found | — | |
| Fix | Agent-blocking CAPTCHA a CAPTCHA stops spam, but also stops AI agents from booking | Present | — | |
| Pass | Semantic landmarks | <main> + <nav> | — | |
| Pass | Agent conversion path | lead form, phone link | — | |
| On-page & links · 2/5 | ||||
| Fail | Broken links checked are dead (404): /practice/family-law-old, /attorneys/jmiller | 2 of 12 | — | High |
| Fix | Meta description trimmed in results | 172 chars | 140-160 | Med |
| Fix | Image alt text images missing alt text | 14 of 38 | — | Med |
| Pass | Title tag | 58 chars | — | |
| Pass | Internal links | 23 internal | — | |
| AI / GEO readiness · 1/10 | ||||
| Fix | llms.txt add one so assistants get a clean summary of what you do | Not found | — | Med |
| Fix | Citable content of page text is in answer-sized passages AI can quote | 18% | — | Med |
| Fix | llms-full.txt the full-content companion AI can read in one pass | Not found | — | |
| Fix | Markdown for AI agents get a page they have to strip down first | HTML only | — | |
| Fix | Link header (RFC 8288) canonical and alternates are buried in the HTML only | None | — | |
| Fix | Lists & tables long paragraphs are harder for AI to quote | None | — | |
| Fix | Numeric proof pages with hard facts get quoted more than ones with adjectives | 1 on the page | — | |
| Fix | Freshness signal AI can't tell how current the page is | None | — | |
| Fix | Question-style headings they mirror the prompts buyers type into AI | None | — | |
| Pass | AI crawler access | All allowed | — | |
| Crawlability & indexing · 3/4 | ||||
| Fix | Canonical tags missing a self-canonical, risk of duplicate-content dilution | 2 practice-area pages | — | Med |
| Pass | HTTPS | Valid certificate | — | |
| Pass | XML sitemap | /sitemap.xml found | — | |
| Pass | robots.txt | Present | — | |
Page speed & Core Web Vitals
Google PageSpeed Insights + real-user Chrome data. Slow mobile pages get fewer AI citations and lose customers before the page even loads.
Good targets: load (LCP) under 2.5s · tap response (INP) under 200ms · layout shift (CLS) under 0.1.
Start here: your fastest technical wins
These come from the live scan of your site, not the AI-visibility roadmap above. That roadmap is the strategy to get named; these three are the quickest technical fixes to ship first — most take an afternoon and don't need a developer.
Most AI-audit reports stop at “you're not cited.” We also found 2 dead links and 3 orphan pages (Mediation, Child Support, Prenuptial Agreements) with fewer than 2 internal links — pages even Google struggles to find. Fixing internal links is free and often moves the needle fastest.
How much AI search your niche gets - and who's winning it
The full audit measures how often buyers ask AI about family law firms in Sacramento, whether that demand is rising or falling, and which sites AI cites when it answers.
See the demand behind your niche
AI search volume, the 12-month trend, and the domains AI cites for your family law firms searches. It's part of the full audit.
Unlock the full audit — $49You just saw one assistant. Your buyers ask four.
This was a Gemini-only sample. For a one-time $49 we scan every major AI assistant, dig into why buyers are being pointed elsewhere, and hand you the exact fixes, so more of them come to you direct.
- All four AI assistants — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, five samples each. Not one in four.
- A per-term scorecard — every question scored across all four, so you fix the pages that actually cost you customers.
- The full competitor board — who AI recommends instead of you, across all four assistants.
- Your leakage map — which assistants send your buyers to directories and middlemen instead of your own site.
- AI search demand for your niche — how much buyers ask AI about what you do, whether it's rising or falling month over month, and which sites AI cites instead of you.
- A 10-page site crawl — your service pages, not just the homepage.
- Domain authority — how trusted your domain is to AI and search, the off-site signal behind why some businesses get named.
- Security & headers — the trust signals AI and Google quietly check for.
- Paste-ready schema — Service, FAQ, Organization and LocalBusiness JSON-LD, written for your site.
- Rewritten titles & meta — for every page, drafted from your real content.
- A ready-to-paste FAQ — the questions buyers actually ask AI, answered.
- An llms.txt file — tells AI crawlers exactly what you offer.
- Your full fix roadmap — every fix ranked by impact, quick wins first.
Three ways forward, whenever you’re ready
All four assistants, the full per-term scorecard, and the paste-ready fix kit. You ship the changes.
Get the auditA fresh scan every week, your score trend on one chart, and an alert the moment AI changes its answer.
Start MonitorOur team makes every fix, sets up review and lead follow-up, and keeps you named, month after month.
Let us do itThis chart adds a point every time these inputs are re-scanned. One scan is a snapshot; the trend is what shows whether your fixes are working.
1 scan