This is a sample report. Hartwell & Birch Family Law is a fictional business and the answers below are generated sample data.
Your report runs against live AI answers and looks exactly like this. Run your free check. It takes about a minute.
When buyers ask AI, Hartwell & Birch Family Law mostly isn't the answer.
AI recommends Vance Legal Group about 3.2x more often than you. Across 8 real search-and-assistant tests, AI names Hartwell & Birch Family Law in just 22% of answers - and in 4 of them you never appear at all. Every one is a high-intent buyer handed to a competitor or a platform. The good news: the gap is fixable, and the plan below shows exactly how.
Each bar is how often AI names that business — an answer can name several or none, so they don't add up to 100%.
All 4 AI assistants
PerplexityOnly 10% of AI's links point home. The rest is still open.
Every time AI answers a buyer, it links somewhere. 83% goes to platforms and directories that put themselves between you and the buyer, and 7% to guides, reviews and rivals - pages you could be cited on, but aren't yet.
Every one of those 83% reaches your buyer before you do. Get named and cited directly, and the customer comes straight to you.
See every fix that wins you customers
These are your top 3 on Gemini alone. The full audit ranks every fix across all four AI assistants, each with copy-paste markup, so more buyers come to Hartwell & Birch Family Law direct instead of through a middleman.
Unlock the full audit — $149One-time. No subscription.
Website Health scorecard
Every signal AI assistants and Google use to decide whether to recommend you — measured live on your site. Worst sections first, so what to fix is up top.
| Status | Check | Result | Target | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structured data (schema) · 0/2 | ||||
| Fail | Business schema no LegalService or LocalBusiness markup, so AI can't read your practice areas or service area | Generic Organization only | — | High |
| Fail | FAQ schema you're invisible to the question-style prompts clients ask AI | No FAQPage markup | — | High |
| Performance · 1/4 | ||||
| Fail | Largest Contentful Paint on mobile, visitors leave before it loads | 4.8s | <2.5s | High |
| Fix | Layout shift (CLS) content jumps as it loads | 0.21 | <0.1 | Med |
| Fix | Page weight (HTML) heavy markup slows first paint | 312 KB | <120 KB | Med |
| Pass | Server response (TTFB) | 1.1s | — | |
| On-page & links · 2/5 | ||||
| Fail | Broken links checked are dead (404): /practice/family-law-old, /attorneys/jmiller | 2 of 12 | — | High |
| Fix | Meta description trimmed in results | 172 chars | 140-160 | Med |
| Fix | Image alt text images missing alt text | 14 of 38 | — | Med |
| Pass | Title tag | 58 chars | — | |
| Pass | Internal links | 23 internal | — | |
| AI / GEO readiness · 1/3 | ||||
| Fix | llms.txt add one so assistants get a clean summary of what you do | Not found | — | Med |
| Fix | Citable content of page text is in answer-sized passages AI can quote | 18% | — | Med |
| Pass | AI crawler access | All allowed | — | |
| Crawlability & indexing · 3/4 | ||||
| Fix | Canonical tags missing a self-canonical, risk of duplicate-content dilution | 2 practice-area pages | — | Med |
| Pass | HTTPS | Valid certificate | — | |
| Pass | XML sitemap | /sitemap.xml found | — | |
| Pass | robots.txt | Present | — | |
Page speed & Core Web Vitals
Google PageSpeed Insights + real-user Chrome data. Slow mobile pages get fewer AI citations and lose customers before the page even loads.
Good targets: load (LCP) under 2.5s · tap response (INP) under 200ms · layout shift (CLS) under 0.1.
Start here: your fastest technical wins
These come from the live scan of your site, not the AI-visibility roadmap above. That roadmap is the strategy to get named; these three are the quickest technical fixes to ship first — most take an afternoon and don't need a developer.
Most AI-audit reports stop at “you're not cited.” We also found 2 dead links and 3 orphan pages (Mediation, Child Support, Prenuptial Agreements) with fewer than 2 internal links — pages even Google struggles to find. Fixing internal links is free and often moves the needle fastest.
You just saw one assistant. Your buyers ask four.
This was a Gemini-only sample. For a one-time $149 we scan every major AI assistant, dig into why buyers are being pointed elsewhere, and hand you the exact fixes, so more of them come to you direct.
- All four AI assistants — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, five samples each. Not one in four.
- A per-term scorecard — every question scored across all four, so you fix the pages that actually cost you customers.
- The full competitor board — who AI recommends instead of you, across all four assistants.
- Your leakage map — which assistants send your buyers to directories and middlemen instead of your own site.
- A 10-page site crawl — your service pages, not just the homepage.
- Domain authority — how trusted your domain is to AI and search, the off-site signal behind why some businesses get named.
- Security & headers — the trust signals AI and Google quietly check for.
- Paste-ready schema — Tour, FAQ, Organization and LocalBusiness JSON-LD, written for your site.
- Rewritten titles & meta — for every page, drafted from your real content.
- A ready-to-paste FAQ — the questions buyers actually ask AI, answered.
- An llms.txt file — tells AI crawlers exactly what you offer.
- Your full fix roadmap — every fix ranked by impact, quick wins first.
Three ways forward, whenever you’re ready
All four assistants, the full per-term scorecard, and the paste-ready fix kit. You ship the changes.
Get the auditA fresh scan every week, your score trend on one chart, and an alert the moment AI changes its answer.
Start MonitorIf this feels like a lot, our team makes the fixes and keeps you named, month after month.
Book a callThis chart adds a point every time these inputs are re-scanned. One scan is a snapshot; the trend is what shows whether your fixes are working.
1 scan